Based on the recommendations of commenters who used their real names, I took down the previous post. It is hard to translate from the rabbinic Hebrew in which I originally wrote it, but combined with the post from two weeks ago it is an analysis of an aspect of R. Akiva Eiger’s position on the death penalty and reconciliation of multiple statements. There were some serious questions in the comments on the analysis, but they will have to be discussed in a different forum.
Does that mean that you pay no attention to the suggestions of pseudonymous commenters here, longstanding as they may be?
יישר כחך
same here for many reasons – intelectual and societal
“Accept the truth from wherever it comes” – even a pseudo-anonymous commenter!
Especially when the pseudononymous commenters merely suggested you discuss the post with a professional before leaving it up.
Oh man! What did I miss?